Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01489
Original file (PD 2012 01489.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW 

 

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY 

CASE NUMBER: PD1201489 SEPARATION DATE: 20031016 

BOARD DATE: 20130117 

 

 

SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this 
covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (55B/Ammunition Specialist), medically 
separated for chronic low back pain (LBP). The CI failed conservative treatment to include 
medications, physical therapy (PT), chiropractic care and temporary profiles. The chronic LBP 
condition could not be adequately rehabilitated and did not improve adequately with 
treatment to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or 
satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a 
Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical 
Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The PEB adjudicated the chronic LBP condition as 
unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities 
(VASRD) and cited application of DoDI 1332.39 and AR 635-40. The CI made no appeals, and 
was medically separated with a 10% disability rating. An administrative change was made to 
item 10 of the original PEB determination, and the overall rating was not changed from 10%. 

 

 

CI CONTENTION: “Chronic lower back pain degenerative muscle damage in back, Plantar 
Fasciitis in both feet, Chronic arthritis in left ankle due to break in tibia/fibia. (sic)” 

 

 

SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI 
6040.44, enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined 
by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the 
CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings 
for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The unfitting condition chronic LBP as 
requested for consideration meets the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview; 
and, is addressed below. The other requested conditions of plantar fasciitis, and chronic 
arthritis in left ankle are not within the Board’s purview. Any conditions or contention not 
requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain 
eligible for future consideration by the service Board for Correction of Military Records. 

 

 

RATING COMPARISON: 

 

Service Admin Correction – Dated 20030709 

VA (16 mons pre-sep) – All Effective Date 20031017 

Condition 

Code 

Rating 

Condition 

Code 

Rating 

Exam 

Chronic Low Back Pain 
without Neurologic 
Abnormality 

5299-5295 

10% 

Low Back Strain (also Claimed as 
Mechanical LBP and HNP) 

5237 

10% 

20020628 

.No Additional MEB/PEB Entries. 

Residual, Left Ankle Fracture 
Postoperative with Scar and DJD 
and Decreased Range of Motion 

5010-5271 

10% 

20020628 

0% X 2 

 

Combined: 10% 

Combined: 20% 



 

 

ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the CI’s contention that suggests ratings should 
have been conferred for other conditions documented at the time of separation. The Board 


wishes to clarify that it is subject to the same laws for service disability entitlements as those 
under which the Disability Evaluation System (DES) operates. While the DES considers all of the 
member's medical conditions, compensation can only be offered for those medical conditions 
that cut short a member’s career, and then only to the degree of severity present at the time of 
final disposition. However the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set 
of laws (Title 38, United States Code), is empowered to compensate all service-connected 
conditions and to periodically reevaluate said conditions for the purpose of adjusting the 
Veteran’s disability rating should the degree of impairment vary over time. 

 

Chronic Low Back Pain Condition: The CI had a several year history of non-traumatic, non-
radiating LBP which failed to resolve or improve with vigorous conservative treatment 
modalities to include chiropractic care and local steroid injections. The CI had no long-term 
resolution of his symptoms. Radiological imaging of the lumbar spine plain films (dated 
October 1995, February and August 2002) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans (dated 
November 1993 and January 2003) were normal. 

 

The goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in 
arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are 
summarized in the chart below. 

 

Thoracolumbar ROM 

(degrees) 

VA C&P ~16 Mos. Pre-
Sep 

Chiro ~11 Mos. Pre-
Sep 

PT ~7 Mos. Pre-
Sep 

MEB ~5 Mos. Pre-
Sep 

Flexion (90 Normal) 

90 (45) 

70 

60 

50 

Ext (0-30) 

30 (15) 

20 

30 

10 

R Lat Flex (0-30) 

35 

35 

15 

10 

L Lat Flex 0-30) 

35 

35 

15 

10 

R Rotation (0-30) 

30 (20) 

25 

- 

30 

L Rotation (0-30) 

30 

20 

- 

30 

Combined (240) 

250 

205 

 

140 

Comment: VA 
normal ROMs 
effective 20030926 

(#) = begins painful ROM; 
limp 

tender; painful 
motion; spasm 

tender; painful 
motion 

tender; spasm; 
painful limited ROM 

§4.71a Rating 

10% 

10% 

20% 

20% 



Note: ROM data measurements are in degrees 

 

At the MEB exam, the CI reported having continued progressive worsening of mid to LBP 
described as mostly non-radiating with a daily pain rated at 5/10. The MEB physical exam 
noted tenderness, spasm, and painful ROM to the lumbar spine as summarized above. 
Treatment notes indicated episodic spasms, pain-limited ROMs, and abnormal gait. 

 

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam, the CI reported progressive LBP rated at 
7/10 every other day with performing normal daily activities. Examination revealed normal, but 
painful ROM as summarized in the exam chart above. There was no VA exam proximate to the 
date of separation (DOS). Post-separation VA exam accomplished in 2006, over 2 years remote 
from separation was rated by the VA at 10%. 

 

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The 
PEB coded the back condition utilizing the 2002 VASARD rating rules as 5299-5295, analogous 
to lumbosacral strain and citing DoDI 1332.39 and AR 635-40. The VA exams for rating at 10% 
were over 12 months remote from separation. The chiropractic exam 11 months prior to 
separation was unclear (hand-written) if there was muscle spasm. The Board considered it 
most likely to reflect spasm given other non-charted positive chiropractic tests. Additionally, 
the Board unanimously concurred that the forward flexion on the hand-written examination 7 
months prior to separation was indeed 60 degrees versus 80 degrees. Upon deliberation, the 
Board agreed in this case that the MEB examination had the highest probative value for rating 


at the time of separation and was supported by treatment records indicating additional 
episodes of spasm and abnormal gait in the year preceding separation. 

 

After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable 
doubt) and §4.7 (higher of two evaluations), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% 
for the low back condition and change of VASRD code to 5237 to comply with the VASRD in 
effect at the time of separation. 

 

 

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or 
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were 
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB 
reliance on DoDI 1332.39, AR 635-40, and the older VASRD for rating the low back condition 
was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of those instructions 
and with the applicable VASRD by the Board. In the matter of the chronic LBP condition, the 
Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5237 IAW VASRD §4.71a. 
There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration. 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as 
follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: 

 

UNFITTING CONDITION 

VASRD CODE 

RATING 

Lumbosacral strain 

5237 

20% 

COMBINED 

20% 



 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120816, w/atchs 

Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record 

Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record 

 

 

 

 

 

 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF 

 Acting Director 

 Physical Disability Board of Review 


SFMR-RB 


 

 

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency 

(TAPD-ZB / XXXXXXXXXX), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557 

 

 

SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation 

for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20130003893 (PD201201489) 

 

 

1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of 
Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the 
subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, 
I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% 
without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final. 

 

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be 
corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum. 

 

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided 
to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have 
shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this 
memorandum without enclosures. 

 

 BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY: 

 

 

 

 

Encl XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 

 Deputy Assistant Secretary 

 (Army Review Boards) 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00084

    Original file (PD2012-00084.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were forwarded for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The examiner performed an additional ROM examination with three repetitions recorded as lumbar flexion 50, 50, and 50 degrees. The VA spine Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination performed on 25 March 2005 did not record thoracolumbar ROM but documented absence of tenderness and muscle spasm, with normal gait and posture.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00800

    Original file (PD 2012 00800.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was medically separated with a 10% disability rating. The PEB rated the CI chronic LBP 10% under code 5299-5237 (lumbosacral strain) citing the ROM examination from the 21 July 2003 reported in the MEB NARSUM showing flexion greater than 60 degrees. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Chronic Low Back Pain, Secondary to Degenerative...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01028

    Original file (PD2011-01028.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board evaluates VA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. The low back pain also radiated to the left buttock, hip and the upper anterior left thigh including “left sacroiliac joint pain, which is thought to be related to the low back pain.” X-rays of the lumbar spine and sacroiliac joints were normal; MRI of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00501

    Original file (PD2013 00501.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. In addition, the CI was notified by the Army that her case may eligible for review of the military disability evaluation of any mental health (MH) condition in accordance with Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of Service members who were referred to a...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00793

    Original file (PD2011-00793.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    “Chronic low back pain (LBP) due to lumbar spondylosis and spinal stenosis” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. Flex (0-90)60⁰90⁰COMBINED (240)240⁰240⁰CommentSlight tenderness bilateral lumbar areaNormal gait and posture, no painful ROM, no muscle spasm§4.71a Rating20%0%*At the MEB exam the CI reported “I have a bad back” and medicated with Motrin or Naprosyn for pain. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00297

    Original file (PD2012-00297.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY SEPARATION DATE: 20060126 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE NUMBER: PD1200297 BOARD DATE: 20121102 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a 1LT/O-2 (00E, Student Officer) medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP). The CI accepted the PEB findings, and was medically separated with a 10% disability rating. 2...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00865

    Original file (PD2011-00865.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA and PEB both rated the back pain condition 10%. Notably, on the chiropractic examination with near normal lumbar flexion, these signs were absent and this examination was consistent with the post-separation C&P examination as noted above. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the contended condition; and, therefore, no additional...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01128

    Original file (PD2011-01128.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The two VA examinations documented an antalgic gait and reduced ROM. The second VA examination documented that the strength was normal and spasm absent despite the history of worsened symptoms. ______________________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING 5237 5099-5003 Not...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02730

    Original file (PD-2013-02730.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Low Back Pain523710%Strain, Thoracolumbar Spine523710%20070521Other x0 (Not in Scope)Other x 6(Not in Scope)20070521 Combined: 10%Combined:50%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20070618 ( most proximate to date of separation) Chronic LBP Condition . Physical therapy ROM was TL flexion of 50 degrees (normal 90 degrees) and TL combined ROM of 152 degrees (normal 240 degrees) with ROM noted to be limited by pain.At...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02126

    Original file (PD-2013-02126.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Back Pain… 523710%Mechanical Low Back Pain with Degenerative Facet Disease,Lumbar Sprain524210%20050107Other x0Other x16 RATING: 10%RATING: 60%*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050401(most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. Chronic Back Pain Condition . RECOMMENDATION : The...